Strategy & Governance
AI policy, decision rights, accountability structures, ethics and bias review, risk classification, strategy alignment, and governance of agentic and vendor-provided AI.
9 core + 1-2 sector-specificAn evidence-informed maturity profile showing how your organization currently describes its AI readiness across the four dimensions that determine whether adoption can hold.
Four dimensions, each with core questions for all organizations and one question that adapts to your sector.
AI policy, decision rights, accountability structures, ethics and bias review, risk classification, strategy alignment, and governance of agentic and vendor-provided AI.
9 core + 1-2 sector-specificApproved AI toolset, data quality and readiness, security and privacy controls, vendor governance, and model performance monitoring.
6 core + 1 sector-specificStaff AI literacy, critical judgment and automation bias training, leadership engagement, board oversight, and role-specific readiness for change.
5 core + 1-2 sector-specificAI integration into workflows, outcome measurement, post-deployment learning, incident response, and responsible deployment practices.
4 core + 1-2 sector-specificReview the framework map before starting. It shows how the four dimensions, sector probes, maturity levels, and follow-up guidance fit together.
Each question uses a four-point scale anchored to observable institutional practice — not perceptions of effort or intent.
No formal process. Adoption is undocumented, uncontrolled, or left to individuals.
Activity exists but without documentation, named ownership, or organizational consistency.
A policy or process exists and has been applied to at least one real use case — not just written or approved.
Governance is institutionalized across roles and updates as AI capabilities and requirements evolve.
One respondent should have cross-institutional knowledge — policy, infrastructure, staff capability, and operations
Answer for current state — what is applied today, not what is planned, underway, or in draft
Sector-specific questions adapt to your context: education, health, government, or international development
Working-group completion is supported — score differences across team members are informative, not errors to reconcile
This is a self-assessment instrument. Scores reflect the organization's own evaluation and are most reliable when completed by someone with genuine cross-institutional knowledge. Team completion and stakeholder validation improve reliability; peer benchmarking should be treated as a separate advisory exercise when sufficient comparison data is available.
Available in English, French, and Arabic at launch. These languages cover a significant share of the sectors and regions served. Organizations whose primary working language is not covered are encouraged to complete the assessment in their strongest available language.
A structured questionnaire covering your current policies, systems, people, and learning practices. Most respondents complete it in a single session.
Provide your contact details so the assessment can send your automated profile report by email.
Your AI Maturity Profile is generated immediately and displayed on screen — dimension scores, priority alerts, and a 90-day action plan. A PDF copy is emailed automatically. After reviewing, you can request an optional written advisory analysis from Meridian.
If your profile report or written analysis indicates a need for deeper engagement, we can scope an Institutional Diagnostic Sprint.